Posts Tagged ‘politics’

From Social Media to Social Action.

January 26th, 2010 by Steve Lawson

NCVO - Campaigns Conference - The New Politics

Image by @benjaminellis

When ‘awareness’ isn’t enough.
(Text by Steve Lawson)

We spend a huge amount of time raising awareness about issues. We’re really good at it. It’s a very British thing to do. We write letters to local newspapers, we write to our MP, we talk to other people about them doing something.

The web makes it so much easier to raise awareness. We can join facebook groups, we can ‘retweet’ quotes and links – we don’t even need to click the link to do it. Actions like the campaign against Jan Moir and her odious writing in the Mail suggest that people can mobilize if they are incensed enough, but did the Mail’s circulation drop? Did anyone continue to hold the Mail to account for the odious writing they publish every other day of the year? Some may have, the vast majority didn’t. They felt justified that Moir was vilified, and were happy that justice was served via twitter.

Were we wrong to retweet the Jam Moir story? Or Trafigura? Of course not – both were instances of genuine outrage at things that more people should know about (though in the case of the Mail there’s perhaps a lesson about the oxygen of publicity). Raising awareness is not a bad thing in an of itself. And it is what the web does best. But the link between that diffuse outrage across a social network – connected only by a hashtag or membership of a facebook group – and action, physical protest, changes in behaviours, habits, conversations with people who don’t already agree with us, boycotts, fund-raising… that’s the tricky bit.

And it’s why, when thinking about the use of social media in a campaign, literacy is WAY more important than policy - have ‘rules’ for twitter usage may end up being counter-productive for your organisation. Understanding the way that your fellow Twitter-users engage with the things they find on there is vital to making your campaign materials usable, shareable, clickable, and to them leading to a higher proportion of actions. Same for facebook groups. I’ve just been listening to an Jackie Schneider of Merton Parents For Better Food In Schools talking about Local activism, and she referenced the power of the ‘easy win’ – of people dipping their toe into the campaigning world seeing the fruits of their labours early on as motivation to keep going. It’s a brilliant and simple observation, and one that’s well learned online. Have a listen to her talking about it:

This is also where information aggregators come in so useful, and where Louder.org.uk can be used to great effect to link Social Media presences and content to actions, both online and off. As a way of integrating email campaigns with contacting MPs, signing petitions and disseminating information about protests and other actions, Louder is designed to make the transition from awareness to action as easy as possible.

Emerging Themes at #newpol

January 26th, 2010 by Steve Lawson

NCVO - Campaigns Conference - The New Politics

Image by @BenjaminEllis

The day is drawing to the late afternoon here at the NCVO New Politics Campaigns Conference and we thought we’d highlight a couple of key themes that have emerged out of the panels, discussions and web-wide conversations.

- Keeping it local
- Social media and the web

Making campaigns locally relevant - many of the workshops and the representatives of the varied charities and NGOs in attendance have been highlighting a need for a return to grassroots politics/activism. Combatting the fatigue of the big national yah-boo politics (whether in evidence or constructed by the media) and reaching out to people on a local (individual) level. This approach is also more likely to appeal to the PPCs that charities and NGOs need on their side to bring about political change, and keeps their campaigns relevant. For more discussion on this issue give the following audioboo a listen:


Social media and the web
- though the conference opened with the fear that social media and technology might remove the need for campaigning organisations, the majority of delegates and workshops were very enthusiastic about the opportunities that social media allowed for grass roots, online activism. The opening notion suggested that tech was taking over, whereas the majority of the attendees recognised social media as one of many tools at their disposal. Social media can be a really useful and easy way of connecting to some your community – not all, and that’s why it’s only one tool of many. Unfortunately the ‘brand new – all change’ version of the social media story touted by the media makes many resistant, or leads them to highlight all the things it doesn’t do (reflective, face to face, sustained, or sustainable debate). The workshops focussed on social media as facilitating conversation – conversations that can’t happen online if you wouldn’t have them offline – you need to understand to whom and why you’re talking, as well noting that the reason there’s so much focus on it is because it’s new and is useful to learn to use, not because it’s the be all and end all of political and community engagement.

Have a listen to this excellent audioboo with Stella Creasy, Labour PPC for Walthamstow and head of campaigns at the Scout Association chatting with @solobasssteve about Social Media and Power to the People.


Want to comment on any of the conversations going on? Got some big ideas of your own? Join in on the comments thread of this post.

Afternoon panel live blog.

January 26th, 2010 by Hannah Nicklin

‘Knowing your left from your right – dividing lines at the 2010 election’

Panellists:
- Oliver Letwin MP, Chairman of the Conservative Policy Review
- Danny Alexander MP, Chair of the Liberal Democrat Manifesto Group
- Chuka Umunna, Labour PPC

Want to comment on any of the conversations going on? Got some big ideas of your own? Join in on the comments thread of this post.

Live Stream of John Bercow

January 26th, 2010 by Hannah Nicklin

A quick mobile live stream of John Bercow’s pre-lunch speech.

PA8Q9845

Image by @benjaminellis

Want to comment on any of the conversations going on? Got some big ideas of your own? Join in on the comments thread of this post.

Images from #newpol

January 26th, 2010 by Hannah Nicklin

A slideshow of images taken by @benjaminellis of the day’s proceedings, updated as they’re added.

See more via the flickr tag.

Want to comment on any of the conversations going on? Got some big ideas of your own? Join in on the comments thread of this post.

Audioboos from #newpol

January 26th, 2010 by Hannah Nicklin

See below for a playlist of the Audioboo podcasts recorded on the ground at the London NCVO New Politics conference, talking to both speakers, and the charities and NGOs themselves for a reaction to the conversations and content coming out of today.

Want to comment on any of the conversations going on? Got some big ideas of your own? Join in on the comments thread of this post.

James Thirtle

Is anybody listening?

January 11th, 2010 by James Thirtle

If your campaign isn’t Emotionally Intelligent, then no.

With the general election campaign gearing up we are seeing a vast increase in political communication.  But how much of it is effective?  Given its aim is presumably to make us vote for our party or change allegiance to another, how often does it succeed?  In fact, how many of the words filling the airwaves, adverts, newspapers and blogs are even received, let alone acted upon?  The most common reaction to political communication at present seems to be a tired shrug, or an irritated closing of the ears.

We have all become adroit at shutting out messages we don’t wish to hear.  Campaigns aimed at changing lifestyle behaviour or shifting opinions get lost in the background noise of society.  In fact, the ability to shut out this noise so you can form your own thoughts and opinions is a necessary skill for anyone living in the communication age.

Campaigners of all stripes face a significant and yet horribly simple problem – how to communicate, how to be heard, how to reach people.  If you fail in this your campaign fails at the first hurdle.  We all have filters to keep information out.  If we still lived in a tribal culture of around one hundred individuals then our instinct would be to listen carefully to all of the information that flowed our way.  But our virtual tribe – the number of people who wish to communicate with us – now reaches the tens of thousands.  Filters are necessary.

The filtering process we use is sophisticated in outcome yet simple to describe: we listen to what feels right.  Above all we trust our feelings to decide which information is relevant, honest and in our interests.  The unconscious processes involved in creating this momentary feeling are incredibly complex, taking account of our experiences, values and the perceived intent behind the communication.  Put simply, if crudely, we all possess an incredibly sophisticated bullshit detector.  Campaigners, politicians, anyone who wishes to influence the decision making of the public, ignore this at their peril.

As we become more media savvy we are learning to see through the sound bites, media campaigns and interview techniques used by those who want us to think differently.  The welcome fact is that deception is becoming less effective, spin and manipulation is being filtered out, and sincerity may be the only way to get a message across.  Campaigns must be understood in this context if they are to be effective.  The quality of an individual that makes them trustworthy, able to communicate with us, and able to form a deep relationships, is called emotional intelligence.  This same quality must be found in campaigns and communications if they are to be successful.

An emotionally intelligent campaign acknowledges the way individuals filter information and make decisions.  This is largely not an analytic, intellectual, process – it is a subconscious, intuitive, process.  Effective communication must feel right to the person who receives it.  Firstly it must strike them as being sincere, secondly it must feel relevant; that it relates to their world and their values.  We instinctively respond positively to those people around us we feel are open hearted and demonstrate integrity.  We judge communication and campaigns in the same way.

Here’s a simple thought experiment: two friends approach you wanting to borrow money.  The first speaks eloquently, giving facts and figures that express clearly why he should borrow your money, yet throughout you suspect these are not his own words and someone else has helped write his argument.  The second speaks from the heart, his request is simple, direct and, although not always eloquent, you recognise his own thoughts and feelings being expressed.  Which friend would you lend your money to?  So which politician will you vote for?

James Thirtle, www.insightemotionalintelligence.com, is a Consultant and Trainer specialising in applying Emotional Intelligence to campaigning and communication.